Trust + transparency

Data methodology + editorial standards

How we collect, verify + publish data on Australian bariatric surgeons + weight-loss clinics. AHPRA + ANZMOSS source attribution per dataset, editorial standards, our approach to corrections, and CC BY 4.0 licensing for republication.

The Health Desk · Editorial team, aged care + dental + plastic surgery + dermatology + weight-loss + psychology · Updated 14 May 2026 · How we rank · Editorial standards

What we publish

5 datasets, fully documented

Weight-loss clinic directory (20 clinics + surgeons)

Open page →

Source

AHPRA Specialist Register + ANZMOSS member directory + TGA-approved supply chain data

www.ahpra.gov.au/

Update cadence

Continuous; AHPRA register checked monthly

Fields

Name, slug, city, suburb · Clinic type (bariatric / GLP-1 telehealth / medical / dietitian) · Lead clinician + designation · ANZMOSS membership · AHPRA registration · Years in practice + founded year · Hospital affiliations · Programs offered

Method

Every surgeon entry verified against AHPRA Specialist Register — must hold current registration without conditions, with FRACS (General Surgery or Upper GI / Bariatric) specialty. ANZMOSS membership cross-checked against the public member directory. Hospital affiliations sourced from each surgeon's website + cross-checked against published bariatric program directories at each hospital.

Bariatric surgeons (11 clinics)

Open page →

Source

AHPRA + ANZMOSS member directory

anzmoss.com.au/

Update cadence

Continuous; ANZMOSS refresh monthly

Fields

Lead surgeon + FRACS qualification · ANZMOSS membership flag · Years in practice · Hospital affiliations · Programs offered (sleeve / bypass / band / revision / SADI-S)

Method

Sortable by ANZMOSS member status + years in practice. Volume figures (when published by clinic) are reported but not used for ranking — clinics that don't self-publish volume aren't penalised. Surgeons under 5 years post-fellowship are included if ANZMOSS members + practising at a high-volume bariatric centre.

All five datasets are downloadable as CSV from our press kit under CC BY 4.0 — use freely with attribution.

Editorial standards

7 commitments we hold ourselves to

1

Verified data takes precedence over estimates

Where we have a school's fee, ICSEA, ATAR or NAPLAN figure from a primary source, we cite + use it. Where we don't, we either estimate using a documented methodology (ABS-indexed fees) or omit the field. We never invent figures.

2

Estimates are visually distinguished from verified data

On every per-school chart + table, verified data points are filled circles; indexed estimates are hollow circles with the methodology disclosed inline. The "Verified" column on /fee-inflation/ shows which schools have full verified chains.

3

Citations + sources on every dataset

Every major data page has a Methodology section identifying source, methodology + suggested citation. Sources include direct links to the original publisher.

4

CC BY 4.0 licensing for backlinks + research

All datasets we produce are released under Creative Commons BY 4.0 — free to republish with attribution. CSV downloads at /press/. JSON-LD Dataset schema on every data page for AI engine + research database eligibility.

5

No paid placements; no review counts where reviews don't exist

Schools cannot pay for higher rankings. Review-based aggregateRating schemas are gated on actual reviewCount > 0 (we never display fake stars). Schools are ranked on ICSEA, fee, outcomes — never editorial preference.

6

Per-school data must be school-attributable

When a per-school ATAR or fee figure is shown, the source URL is recorded + linkable. Discrepancies between our published figure + the school's current website are corrected within 7 days of being flagged.

7

Honest about gaps

Per-school NAPLAN trends, per-school university destinations + per-school scholarship details require manual audit per school + are not yet aggregated. Each affected page discloses this gap + provides a direct CTA to the school's own page.

Corrections + change log

Recent updates + corrections

If you find an error in our data, contact [email protected]. We aim to correct verifiable errors within 7 days + log them publicly here.

12 May 2026

Site relaunched with 14 of 15 Tier 1-3 features built (NAPLAN, ATAR outcomes, fee inflation tracker, university destinations, scholarships guide, school finder quiz, shortlist comparison, sibling calculator, open days guide, learning support, international students, Catholic systemic explainer, boarding directory, annual reports guide). Bus route calculator (#9) deferred (needs GTFS API).

12 May 2026

Real ATAR outcomes data for 47 schools published, sourced from Better Education state rankings.

12 May 2026

NAPLAN 2025 national dataset published, sourced from ACARA 48MB Excel release.

12 May 2026

Fee inflation tracker published — 10 schools verified, 205 ABS-indexed.

12 May 2026

Press kit + 4 CC BY 4.0 CSV downloads published at /press/.

Republication, citations + reuse

All datasets we publish are released under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may republish, build derivative datasets, embed in research outputs, and use commercially.

Required: attribution to "Compare Private Schools" with link back to compareprivateschools.com.au + the relevant page (e.g. /fee-inflation/, /outcomes/, /naplan/).

Where source data is from third parties (ACARA NAPLAN, Better Education ATAR, ABS), please cite the original source as well — full citation provided per dataset above.

For raw CSV downloads + suggested-citation strings per dataset, see our press kit.